The Numbers, Unfiltered
I’m not going to build suspense. Here are the headline numbers from 5 years and 4 months of backtesting my trading strategy on ETH/USDT perpetual futures:
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Starting Capital | $10,000 |
| Ending Balance | $2,999,863 |
| Net Profit | $2,989,863 |
| Total Return | 29,898.64% |
| CAGR | 191.83% |
| Total Trades | 1,768 |
| Win Rate | 51.02% |
| Profit Factor | 1.80 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.052 |
| Max Drawdown | 33.7% ($691,786) |
| Commission Rate | 0.044% per trade (included) |
| Buy & Hold ETH Return | 244.29% |
| Strategy vs Buy & Hold | 122x outperformance |
Now let me break down everything behind these numbers — the strategy, the risk management, the losing periods, and why I believe this data is trustworthy.
The Strategy: Etherium 4H ALPHA v6.1
Core Design
- Pair: ETH/USDT Perpetual (Bybit)
- Timeframe: 4-hour candles
- Direction: Long and Short (916 longs, 852 shorts)
- Max Leverage: 5x
- Risk Per Trade: 4% of account
- Pyramiding: Up to 5 simultaneous positions
The Six Entry Filters
A trade is only opened when ALL six of these indicators agree:
- Trend Magic (CCI 20 + ATR 5): Noise-filtered short-term trend detection
- Bollinger Band Squeeze + Keltner Channel: Volatility compression detection — the calm before the storm
- ZLSMA 150: Zero-Lag Least Squares Moving Average for medium-term trend direction
- EMA 200: Long-term trend gate — longs only above, shorts only below
- RSI > 50: Momentum confirmation
- Chandelier Exit Cross: ATR-based volatility reversal signal
The requirement for unanimous agreement means the system only trades about 15-20% of the time. The rest is waiting. This selectivity is the primary source of edge.
The Exit System
- Stop-Loss: Dynamic — the tighter of ATR Chandelier stop vs. recent swing point
- TP1 (+6.5%): Close 25% of position, move stop to breakeven
- TP2 (+12.5%): Close 50% more
- Profit-Zone Trailing: Activates at +22%, trails 13% behind peak
This structure ensures small wins are locked in quickly while big trends are ridden until they actually reverse — not until I get nervous.
Performance by Market Regime
Bull Market (2020-2021)
ETH went from $200 to $4,800. The strategy captured the majority of this move through long positions with pyramiding. Five simultaneous positions during strong trends maximized the compounding effect.
Bear Market (2022)
ETH crashed from $4,800 to $880. This is where most strategies die. This one survived because:
- Short positions captured downside moves (52.7% win rate on shorts)
- Equity Guard activated during peak drawdown, halving risk automatically
- Maximum drawdown contained to 33.7% vs. ETH’s 80%+ decline
Recovery (2023-2024)
Choppy, trendless periods are the strategy’s weakest environment. Bollinger Squeeze filter prevented many false entries, but some whipsaws were unavoidable. This period contributed the least to overall returns.
New Cycle (2025-2026)
Strategy continues to perform as ETH trades above $3,000 with strong institutional flows. Parameters refined in v6.1 are well-adapted to current market structure.
The Equity Guard: Why I Didn’t Blow Up
When account equity drops below its moving average, the system automatically reduces position size by 50%. This single feature saved the account during the 2022 crash.
Without it, the maximum drawdown would have exceeded 50% — psychologically devastating and mathematically brutal (a 50% loss requires a 100% gain to recover). With it, the drawdown was contained to 33.7%, and recovery took months instead of potentially never.
What the Numbers Don’t Show
Transparency means showing the weaknesses too:
- This is a backtest. Real-world performance will differ due to slippage, execution latency, and liquidity conditions during extreme events.
- Commission of 0.044% is included, but slippage during flash crashes is not. Real slippage could reduce returns by 5-15% annually.
- The 33.7% drawdown happened at the $691K level. At $10K, the same drawdown is $3,370. The dollar amount of pain scales with account size.
- Leverage amplifies everything. 5x leverage means a 10% move against you is a 50% hit to your position. Never use this strategy with more leverage than specified.
How to Verify These Results
Every number in this article can be independently verified:
- Open TradingView
- Load BYBIT:ETHUSDT.P on a 4H chart
- Apply the Pine Script (available on this blog)
- Check the Strategy Tester tab
The code is open. The data is public. The results are reproducible. If you find different numbers, I want to know — because that means either I made an error or the exchange data has changed.
Related Reading
- Why It Took 5 Years to Build a Profitable Trading Bot — A Developer’s Diary
- AutoBot Setup Guide: 15 Minutes, Zero Coding Required
- Best Free Crypto Scalping Signal Tool — 13 Indicators, One Score (2026)
- Crypto Trading Bot ROI: Is 30% Return Really Possible?
- 7 Best Crypto Trading Bots Compared — A Developer’s Honest 2026 Review
The setup guide on this blog walks through the entire process in 15 minutes. No coding required.

Pingback: 7 Best Crypto Trading Bots Compared — A Developer’s Honest 2026 Review - 코인 자동매매 개발 일대기 - Godstary